October 2009 Archives

Here's a follow-up on my last post. Amazon is selling PLI books for the Kindle according to the "Amazon's Kindle to Sell Law Books", Wall Street Journal, July 1, 2009)  In that article, Andrew Frank from Gartner is quoted:

"There are a lot of practical reasons to believe that the digital market may well be more profitable for publishers of legal, medical and educational texts.  Since these texts are reference material, the ability to index them and set up bookmarks, which you can do easily with the Kindle, will save time and money for users."

Save time and money by migrating to electronic books?  That would be a good thing, but not exactly what we've seen from publishers in the past.

I must confess, I always cringe a little when I hear librarians say that though libraries are shrinking, law firms will always have a core collection of hard copy books.  I understand the sentiment and believe it accurately reflects today's environment.  Certainly, many paper treatises, statutes, etc. can be easier to use than their electronic counterparts, web interfaces aren't always intuitive and many attorneys are slow adopters. 

But I've always figured that the right e-book could change all that.  The fact that they haven't become mainstream among lawyers and law firms only means their development hasn't advanced to the point where they are desirable as hard copy substitutes.  As soon as the right e-book solution is reached, something with the combined convenience of hard copy and the power of electronic access, things could change rapidly.

The Amazon Kindle and Sony E-Book are starting to make inroads.  I've been intrigued by the Kindle for a while because of its ability to automatically download newspapers, magazines and books.  Now West has released 30 books for the Kindle.  That's a start.

What's the first thing that comes to my mind in terms of uses in a law firm environment?   How about loading cases to the Kindle or E-Book.  An attorney could take 100's of cases on a plane or to a court room without lugging paper copies.  Let's take that a step further.  Your attorney is on the road, maybe sitting at the airport.  He/she needs to read a case that hasn't been pre-loaded on the Kindle.  You could download the case and send it to his/her Kindle email address.  The attorney would have it in minutes, and wouldn't have to pull out his laptop or try to read a PDF on the small screen of his Blackberry.

Thousands of books could be loaded onto a Kindle, a veritable law library. The technology is no longer an obstacle to this scenario, but publisher's licenses?  That may be another matter. 

 

"Law Offices have been at the forefront of the Enterprise Search market."  is the first sentence in an article about the evolution of enterprise search at the 450 attorney firm, Bracewell & Guilanai LLP -- Third Time a Charm for Law Firm, Network Computing, 10/16/2009.

Law firms at the forefront?  Really?  I'm not sure I'm buying that as a blanket statements, but it does seem to apply to Bracewell.  According to the article, they started out 20 years ago with Open Text, then moved to Autonomy, and are now happily searching using Recommind.  That's an impressive history of search engine implementation and evolution.